Assessment Results
Question # | Short Name | Question Text | Response | Comments |
1 | Extinction risk | Current IUCN Red List category. [Data obtained from the IUCN Red List.] | Endangered (EN) | |
2 | Possibly extinct | Is there a strong possibility that this species might be extinct in the wild? | No / unlikely | Esta especie se considera común dentro de la Sierra de las Minas, pero rara en el Biotopo Universitario Mario Dary Rivera para la Conservación del Quetzal (J.A. Campbell com. pers. Octubre de 2011, R. Morales com. pers. agosto de 2019). En 2021 y 2022 se avistaron 2 y 1 individuos respectivamente en el Biotopo Universitario Mario Dary Rivera para la Conservación del Quetzal (María José Chang, com. pers. 2024) y en 2021 se observaron 4 individuos en un par de noches en el Biotopo Universitario Mario Dary Rivera para la Conservación del Quetzal (Gustavo Ruano, com. pers. 2024). En 2022 se observó 1 individuo en la Reserva Natural Privada Ranchitos del Quetzal (Taller CNA Guatemala 2024) |
3 | Phylogenetic significance | The taxon’s Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) score, as generated by the ZSL EDGE program. (These data are not editable by Assessors). | ED value < 20 | |
4 | Protected habitat | Is a population of at least 50% of the individuals of the taxon included within a well-managed or reliably protected area or areas? | Yes / probably | Esta especie es endémica de la Sierra de las Minas en Guatemala (Taller de Evaluación de la Lista Roja de Guatemala, agosto de 2019). Se le conoce por su localidad tipo de Biotopo del Quetzal (Campbell et al. 2010), Chilascó, (G. Ruano-Fajardo com. pers. agosto de 2019), y tres localidades en Cerro Pinalon: desde arriba Albores, desde arriba San Agustín Acasaguastlán, y de una carretera entre La Trinidad y Cerro Pinalon (Campbell et al. 2010, S. Rovito com. pers. agosto de 2019). Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de las Minas y Biotopo Universitario Mario Dary Rivera para la Conservación del Quetzal |
5 | Habitat for reintroduction, conservation translocation or supplementation | Does enough well-managed and reliably protected habitat exist, either within or outside of currently protected areas that is suitable for conservation translocation, including population restoration or conservation introduction? | Yes / probably | Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de las Minas y Biotopo Universitario Mario Dary Rivera para la Conservación del Quetzal |
6 | Previous reintroductions | Have reintroduction or translocation attempts been made in the past for this species? | No | |
7 | In situ conservation activities | Are any in situ conservation actions currently in place for this species? (Only required if a Red List Assessment has not been completed, or if new actions have been implemented since the last Red List Assessment. (Information from the Conservation Actions section of the Red List assessment should be reviewed and considered when answering this question.). | Yes / probably | Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de las Minas y Biotopo Universitario Mario Dary Rivera para la Conservación del Quetzal |
8 | In situ conservation activities | Are additional in situ conservation actions required to help conserve this species in the wild (e.g. habitat restoration and/or protection, control of invasive species, national legislation etc.)? | Yes / probably | Mejoramiento de la preservación forestal efectiva y el manejo continuo de las áreas protegidas existentes es esencial para la conservación de esta especie. |
9 | In situ research | Is additional in situ research required to better understand the species, e.g. distribution, population trends, natural history etc.? | Yes | Se requiere investigación en distribución, estado poblacional, ecología, amenazas y sus efectos sobre la especie |
10 | Threat mitigation | Are the threats facing the taxon, including any new and emerging threats not considered in the IUCN Red List, potentially reversible? | Threats unlikely to be reversed in time to prevent further decline / extinction | Deforestación debido a la expansión de la agricultura, específicamente las plantaciones de café, tomate (Taller de Evaluación de la Lista Roja de Guatemala, agosto de 2019) y plantaciones de helechos a gran escala (G. Ruano-Fajardo, comunicación personal, agosto de 2019). ). Mayor frecuencia de incendios forestales debido a estaciones secas más prolongadas y patrones de precipitación más erráticos como resultado del cambio climático. La contaminación resultante del uso excesivo de agroquímicos representa una amenaza adicional (D. Ariano-Sánchez com. pers. agosto de 2019). La minería de níquel puede representar una posible amenaza futura una vez que el área ya no esté protegida por la Universidad de San Carlos (D. Ariano-Sánchez y G. Ruano Fajardo, comunicación personal, agosto de 2019). El hongo quítrido patógeno de la salamandra (Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans, “Bsal”) ha provocado una disminución dramática de las salamandras europeas desde su llegada en 2010 a través del comercio internacional de mascotas (Feldmeier et al. 2016). Si bien la presencia del hongo no ha sido confirmada en América, se está propagando en Europa y corre el riesgo de propagarse aún más. Se cree que la amenaza de infección y disminución de la población de salamandras es muy probable y perjudicial para la mayoría de las especies nativas, en caso de que el hongo llegue a Guatemala (Taller de Evaluación de la Lista Roja de Guatemala, agosto de 2019). Cuando se encuentran, las salamandras son perseguidas en Guatemala porque se cree que son venenosas (Taller de Evaluación de la Lista Roja de Guatemala, agosto de 2019). |
11 | Over-collection from the wild | Is the taxon suffering from collection within its natural range, either for food, for the pet trade or for any other reason, which threatens the species’ continued persistence in the wild? | No / unlikely | |
12 | Population recovery | Is the known population of this species in the wild large enough to recover naturally, without ex situ intervention if threats are mitigated? | Yes / probably | |
13 | Action plans | Does an Action Plan for the species already exist, or is one currently being developed? | No | |
14 | Biological distinctiveness | Does the taxon exhibit a distinctive reproductive mode, behaviour, aspect of morphology or physiology, within the Order to which it belongs (e.g. Anura, Passeriformes etc.)? | No aspect of biology known to be exceptional | |
15 | Cultural/socio-economic importance | Does the taxon have a special human cultural value (e.g. as a national or regional symbol, in a historic context, featuring in traditional stories) or economic value (e.g. food, traditional medicine, tourism) within its natural range or in a wider global context? | No | |
16 | Scientific importance | Is the species vital to current or planned research other than species-specific ecology/biology/conservation within the Order to which it belongs (e.g. Anura, Passeriformes etc.) e.g. human medicine, climate change, environmental pollutants and conservation science? | No research dependent on this species | |
17 | Ex situ research | Does conserving this species (or closely related species) in situ depend upon research that can be most easily carried out ex situ? | No | |
18 | Ex situ conservation activities | Is any ex situ research or other ex situ conservation action currently in place for this species? (Information from the Conservation Actions section of the Red List assessment should be reviewed and considered when answering this question.) | No / unlikely | |
19 | Husbandry analog required | If an ex situ rescue program is recommended for this species, would an analog species be required to develop husbandry protocols first? | No / unlikely | |
20 | Husbandry analog | Do the biological and ecological attributes of this species make it suitable for developing husbandry regimes for more threatened related species? i.e. could this species be used in captivity to help to develop husbandry and breeding protocols which could be used for a similar, but more endangered species at a later stage? | No | |
21 | Captive breeding | Has this species been successfully bred and/or maintained in captivity? | Not held in captivity to date | |
22 | Conservation education/ecotourism potential | Is the species especially diurnal, active or colourful, or is there an interesting or unusual aspect of its ecology that make it particularly suitable to be an educational ambassador for conservation of the species in the range country, either in zoos or aquariums or within ecotourism activities? | Yes | Como especie bandera para la conservación en Sierra de las Minas |
23 | Mandate | Is there an existing conservation mandate recommending the ex situ conservation of this taxon? | No | |
24 | Range State approval | If an ex situ initiative was proposed for this species, would it be supported (and approved) by the range State (either within the range State or out-of-country ex situ)? | Yes / probably | |
25 | Founder specimens | Are sufficient animals of the taxon available or potentially available (from wild or captive sources) to initiate an ex situ program, if one was recommended? | Yes / probably | |
26 | Taxonomic status | Has a complete taxonomic analysis of the species in the wild been carried out, to fully understand the functional unit you wish to conserve (i.e. have species limits been determined)? | Yes |
Citation:
Acevedo, M. E. ; Chang, M.J. ; Dahinten B. H. ; García, J.; López de Paz, E. ; Morales, J.R. ; Rivera, M. R. ; Ruano-Fajardo, G. ; Vázquez-Almazán, C. ; Zamora-Jerez, A. 2024. Conservation Needs Assessment for Bolitoglossa daryorum, Guatemala
(AArk/ASG Guatemala Workshop).
https://conservationneeds.org/assessment/7128
Accessed 31 Jan 2025