Conservation Needs Assessment Help
|
|
Consolidated
Assessments
Prior to the development of the online program, Conservation Needs
Assessments were generally carried out during
physical workshops, where scientists,
field biologists, animal husbandry experts and other stakeholders met,
and worked as a single group to assess all of the species of a given
Class (e.g. amphibians), in the particular country or region. This
process resulted in a single assessment, along with a single set of
recommended
conservation actions for each species
in each of the countries that the species occurs. Using the online
program, multiple
assessors will often work independently
from each other to assess species, and generate recommendations for
conservation actions.
Sometimes, more than one assessor will generate an assessment for the
same species in the same country or region. It is likely that due to the
differing individual expertise and experiences of each assessor, some of
the data will differ between assessments for the same species. Although
each and every individual assessment can be viewed, a “consolidated”
version of these assessments allows for the different areas of expertise
from each of the assessors to be included within a single, more holistic
assessment of the conservation needs for each species.
Consolidated assessments can be found in the
National Recommended Conservation Actions report
and on the
View Assessments page, for species
which have more than one assessment in the same country.
All of the responses made by the assessors for each
question are included in consolidated
assessments, with an indication of the percentage of assessors who made
each response in parentheses. As an example, the following consolidated
assessment shows that all assessors (100%) agree that the answer to
question 5 is Yes; half of the assessors (50%) consider that the
answer to question 6 is Yes, but outcome is unknown, and half
(50%) consider that the answer to question 6 is No; and one third
of the assessors (33%) think that the answer to question 7 is Threats
are reversible in time frame, while two thirds (67%) think that
Threats cannot/will not be reversed in time:

In consolidated assessments, all of the conservation actions recommended
by each single assessment are included. For each conservation action,
the number of assessments for the species in the selected country is
shown in parentheses, along with the percentage of those assessments
that recommended each of the conservation actions:
Recommended Conservation Actions: Rescue (n=3,
66.67%), In Situ Conservation (n=3, 100%), In Situ Research
(n=3, 66.67%), Mass Production in Captivity (n=3, 33.33%),
Conservation Education (n=3, 100%), Biobanking (n=3, 66.67%) |
In the example above, 3 individual
assessments are included in this consolidated assessment, with 66.67% of
the assessments recommending Rescue as a conservation action for this
species, 100% of the assessments recommending In Situ Conservation etc. |